🌏 關稅風暴下的台灣兩樣情:高科技突圍、傳產雪上加霜
- 前半段為文章的英文版本 (The first half is the English version)
- 後半段為中文版本 (The second half is the Mandarin version)
====

Taiwan’s Economic Divide Under U.S. Tariffs: High-Tech Thrives, Traditional Industries Struggle
On August 7, 2025, the Trump administration officially imposed a 20% “reciprocal tariff” on Taiwanese goods. While the move has raised alarms across Taiwan’s export-driven economy, its impact has been far from uniform.
What we are witnessing is a striking “two-speed economy”:
- High-tech industries, led by semiconductors and AI servers, remain resilient thanks to their global indispensability and growing U.S. investments.
- Traditional industries, on the other hand, face mounting pressure, squeezed by thin profit margins, lack of U.S. production bases, and competitors like Japan and South Korea enjoying lower 15% tariffs.
The result is a widening gap in both industry performance and stock market trends.

U.S. Tariff Policy in Context
- The Starting Point – Liberation Day Tariffs
- In April 2025, Trump signed an executive order introducing a 10% base tariff plus additional “reciprocal tariffs.”
- Taiwan was initially hit with a steep 32% tariff, though semiconductors were excluded at the time.
- Adjustment in Late July
- On July 31, Washington lowered Taiwan’s reciprocal tariff to 20%, effective August 7.
- Still, this was labeled a “provisional measure”, leaving room for further changes.
- Japan and South Korea’s Advantage
- Both countries struck separate agreements with the U.S., securing a 15% tariff rate.
- Compared with Taiwan’s 20%, this 5% gap creates a critical competitive disadvantage for Taiwan’s exporters.

High-Tech Industries: Resilient and Adaptive
- Indispensable in Global Supply Chains
- Companies like TSMC, MediaTek, Foxconn, Quanta, and Wiwynn are irreplaceable players in semiconductors, AI servers, and cloud infrastructure.
- The U.S. relies heavily on Taiwan for AI, defense, and advanced manufacturing.
- Investing in the U.S. for Strategic Leverage
- TSMC’s Arizona fabs, ASE’s packaging plans, and Quanta/Wiwynn’s new facilities in Texas and Virginia illustrate a clear trend of localization.
- These investments strengthen supply chains and enhance the likelihood of tariff exemptions.
- Turning Pressure into Opportunity
- Rather than crippling growth, tariffs have accelerated Taiwan’s “localization strategy”, embedding production closer to U.S. customers.
- This shift has deepened U.S.-Taiwan industrial ties and increased client stickiness.

Traditional Industries: A Struggle to Survive
- Thin Margins, No Cushion
- Sectors like machine tools, screws & fasteners, bicycle parts, textiles, and footwear often operate on 5–10% margins.
- A 20% tariff wipes out profitability and leaves firms uncompetitive in the U.S. market.
- Lack of U.S. Investment
- Unlike high-tech, most traditional industries are run by SMEs without the capital to set up U.S. facilities.
- This leaves them unable to pursue the “invest-to-exempt” strategy.
- Japan and South Korea’s Price Advantage
- With only 15% tariffs, Japanese and Korean exporters enjoy a 5% cost advantage.
- U.S. buyers, highly price-sensitive in sectors like components and OEM, are already shifting orders away from Taiwan.
- Real-World Impact Emerging
- According to local media reports, some Taiwanese manufacturers have begun adopting “three-day weekends” to cut costs amid collapsing export orders.
- This signals that the tariff war is no longer theoretical—it is reshaping employment and production on the ground.

Taiwan’s Stock Market: A Tale of Two Worlds
- High-Tech Leading the Charge
- The Taiwan Stock Exchange recently hit historic highs, powered by TSMC and AI-related stocks.
- Investors view high-tech firms as capable of weathering tariffs through U.S. investment and technological dominance.
- Traditional Industries Left Behind
- Shares of machine tool makers, fastener companies, and bicycle suppliers have slumped.
- Export-oriented SMEs are suffering from declining orders and idle capacity.
- Structural Divergence
- The stock market reflects the broader divide:
- High-Tech → U.S. investment + technology edge = stock gains.
- Traditional → tariff burden + lost orders = persistent decline.
- The stock market reflects the broader divide:

The U.S. 20% reciprocal tariff has amplified Taiwan’s industrial divide:
- High-tech: leveraging scale, technology, and U.S. investments to remain strong—even turning adversity into growth opportunities.
- Traditional industries: caught in a squeeze between thin margins, lack of U.S. presence, and Japan/Korea’s tariff advantage.
This tariff storm is visibly shaping Taiwan’s stock market, where semiconductors and AI soar while traditional industries sink. Beyond short-term pain, it reveals the structural challenge Taiwan faces: adapting its diverse economy to a world of protectionism and shifting global supply chains.

📖 Further Reading
- Taiwan AI Transformation: Bridging the Industry Divide Through Government and Association Initiatives
- NTD Appreciation: The Real Achilles’ Heel of Taiwan’s Tech Exports
- Taiwan Server Supply Chains Shift to U.S. Amid Tariff Pressures
- Global Tech Trends & the New Taiwan–U.S. Tech Landscape: 5 Key Takeaways from Jefferey Chiu’s Insights
- U.S. Tariffs Hit Taiwan’s Traditional Industries
====

關稅風暴下的台灣兩樣情:高科技突圍、傳產雪上加霜
美國川普政府於 2025 年 8 月 7 日 起,正式對台灣商品加徵 20% 的「對等關稅」。這項政策震動台灣產業界與金融市場,因為它不僅影響出口競爭力,更放大了台灣產業結構的差異。
如今我們看到的是 鮮明的「兩樣情」:
- 半導體與高科技產業,因掌握全球關鍵地位,加上在美國積極布局,反而展現抗壓甚至轉化為契機。
- 傳統產業則因利潤空間有限、缺乏美國投資基礎,加上競爭對手日本與韓國僅需繳交 15% 關稅,處境更加嚴峻,甚至已經傳出部分廠商 周休三日 控管成本的消息【東森財經新聞】。
這不僅是一場關稅衝擊,更是台灣產業分化的縮影。

美國關稅政策脈絡
- 「解放日關稅」的起點
- 2025 年 4 月,川普簽署行政命令,要求對多數國家徵收 10% 基準關稅,並額外課徵「對等關稅」。
- 台灣當時被設定為 32%,但半導體暫時排除在外。
- 7 月下旬的調整
- 經過談判,美國於 7 月 31 日 宣布,台灣的對等關稅調降至 20%,自 8 月 7 日起生效。
- 然而,這只是「臨時性」措施,美國仍保留隨時調整的空間。
- 日韓的比較優勢
- 日本與韓國已先後與美國達成協議,將對美關稅壓低至 15%。
- 相較之下,台灣的 20% 關稅顯得格外不利。

半導體與高科技產業:有能力突圍
- 全球供應鏈核心
- 台積電、聯發科、鴻海、廣達、緯穎等公司,都是全球科技產業無法取代的角色。
- 美國在 AI、雲端、國防產業上高度依賴台灣,對半導體與伺服器的需求迫切。
- 在美投資布局
- 台積電亞利桑那州晶圓廠、日月光在美封測規劃、廣達與緯穎積極在德州與維吉尼亞設廠。
- 這些投資行為不僅鞏固供應鏈,也讓企業有望獲得 關稅豁免。
- 化壓力為契機
- 關稅成為推力,加速高科技產業「去台灣化、在地化」的國際佈局。
- 美國市場的重要性迫使台廠更快完成海外產能部署,反而提升與客戶的黏著度。

傳統產業:雪上加霜的困境
- 利潤有限,難以吸收成本
- 工具機、螺絲扣件、自行車零件、成衣、鞋類等產業,毛利率多在 5%~10%。
- 20% 的關稅直接侵蝕獲利,讓出口美國的產品失去競爭力。
- 缺乏在美投資基礎
- 多數傳產企業以 OEM 或中小規模出口為主,沒有資金或規模在美國設廠。
- 相較之下,高科技產業能以「投資換豁免」,傳統產業則沒有這樣的選項。
- 日韓的稅率優勢
- 日本與韓國產品只需繳 15% 關稅,比台灣低 5%。
- 對於靠價格競爭的傳產而言,這 5% 就足以決定訂單流向。
- 美國買家傾向選擇成本較低的日韓產品,台灣廠商面臨被取代風險。
- 實際衝擊已經浮現
- 根據《東森財經新聞》報導,部分台灣傳產企業因出口訂單急凍,被迫 周休三日,降低產能與人力成本以維持營運。
- 這顯示關稅風暴已經不僅是數字上的壓力,而是直接衝擊到就業與企業經營。

台股的兩樣情
- 半導體與高科技領漲
- 台股大盤近期創下歷史新高,推動力主要來自台積電、AI 伺服器與相關高科技概念股。
- 投資人普遍認為,高科技能藉由在美投資與技術優勢化解風險。
- 傳統產業持續低迷
- 傳產族群如工具機、螺絲扣件、自行車零件,股價普遍走弱,投資信心不足。
- 出口導向的中小型傳產公司,甚至面臨接單下滑與產能閒置的危機。
- 結構性分化
- 台股的走勢清楚反映產業分化:
- 高科技 → 在美投資 + 技術優勢 → 股價創高
- 傳產 → 關稅壓力 + 訂單轉移 → 股價疲軟
- 台股的走勢清楚反映產業分化:

美國 20% 對等關稅,讓台灣產業出現鮮明對比:
- 高科技產業:憑藉全球不可取代的地位與在美投資能力,有效因應甚至逆勢成長。
- 傳統產業:因利潤有限、缺乏國際布局,加上日韓稅率較低,遭遇前所未有的壓力,甚至已經出現周休三日的縮減產能現象。
這場關稅風暴,讓台股出現「兩樣情」── 半導體股強勢領漲、傳統產業股價持續走弱。
它不僅是短期市場現象,更揭示出台灣經濟在全球新局勢下的結構性挑戰。

One thought on “Taiwan’s Economic Divide Under U.S. Tariffs: High-Tech Thrives, Traditional Industries Struggle”